Thursday, July 30, 2009

Hey! Let's take a transistion matrix and convert it into a series of linear equations to gonkulate the number of visits to various pages!

I've been working on learning the wonderful world of queuing theory. Two of the books that I've been using are Analyzing Computer Systems Performance: With Perl: PDQ and Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning By Example.

I've been learning how to apply Dr. Gunther's PDQ API, specifically, PDQ-R which is PDQ for the R programming language. Normally I'd use the Perl::PDQ module but I've found R to be quite handy for crunching numbers. If anything, I'd use perl to munge the data in preparation for crunching by routines in R.

I decided that I would apply PDQ-R to several of the case studies found in Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning By Example. In my first attempt to do so I found some numbers that didn't match between the results of PDQ-R and the Excel spreadsheet available as part of Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning By Example. I contacted Dr. Gunther and he found that there was a bug in PDQ 5.0.1 that he blogged about here. I guess that is my 15 mS of internet fame!

I got side tracked with some work related stuff and went back to the task of applying PDQ-R to some of the case studies found in Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning By Example.

The case study that I have started working on is in Chapter 8: Case Study IV: An E-Business Service.

The author provides us with a Customer Behavior Model Graph of a website:



From this graph we can create a set of linear equations that describes the number of visits to each page of the system presented in the CBMG (seen above). Taking a closer look at the graph we can see that there are probabilities of transitioning between one page to another. For example, the probability of moving from the Home Page (h) to the Login (g) is Phg. The probability of moving from the Login (g) page to the Search (s) page is Psg.

Using these probabilities we can create a set of linear equations to describe the number of visits to each page in the system based upon the number of visits into the entry of the system. In this case, there is only one way into the system and that is via the Entry (e) page.

We can look at the graph and manually derive the linear equations. For example, we can easily see that Vh = Peh*Ve. We can also see that Vg = Phg*Vh + Psg*Vs + Pvg*Vv. Doing this we eventually come up with eight linear equations that we can then solve. (The equations are listed on page 208 of Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning By Example).

The authors of the book provide us with all the probabilities in the form of a Matrix of Transition Probabilities on page 209. Here is that matrix:



(e) (h) (s) (v) (g) (c) (b) (x)
Entry (e) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Home (h) 0 0 0.7 0 0.1 0 0 0.2
Search (s) 0 0 0.4 0.2 0.15 0 0 0.25
View Bids (v) 0 0 0 0 0.65 0 0 0.35
Login (g) 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.6 0.1
Create Auction (c) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Place Bid (b) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Exit (x) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


So we can take those values found in the transition matrix and eventually gonkulate all the visits to each page. Although the transition matrix is provided by the author it is easy enough to re-create this matrix from web logs for a site.

A number of years ago I did the same thing for a major e-Commerce site. At the time my goal was to use the transition matrix to create a universal virtual user that would emulate what real customers did in production. At the time we were using a number of different virtual users and it was a real PITA to increase the number of vusers in a scenario. I figured if I could generate the transition matrix and generate random walks via the transition matrix that my vusers would better represent the traffic of real customers. Unfortunately, I never got to finish the implementation of the UberVuser but I did get to the point of generating a transition matrix. And that sucker was huge! It wasn't a nice 8x8 matrix but rather a 538x538 matrix. Yeah... That's a lot of elements!

So, thinking of my previous experience and looking at the author's provided transition matrix got me to thinking. There's bound to be a way of backing the transition matrix into the set of linear equations that can easily be solved in R (or any other method that can solve linear equations).

I worked it out by hand (more about this below) and everything looked good but to really make this useful I needed to automate the routine. I sat down looked at the problem and thought that I was going to have to do a bunch of element manipulation when the solution hit me. It turned out to be so damned simple! I love it when a complicated problem can be easily solved. It just amuses the hell out of me.

This is how I backed out the equations by hand. I know that the transition matrix has from "from" pages down the rows and the "to" along the columns. So for example, if I wanted to figure out the equation for the Vs I would work down the column and use the coefficients of the transition matrix as multipliers for the V variables.

For example, with the 3rd column with solving for Vs:

The third column of the transition matrix is:



(s)
(e) 0
(h) 0.7
(s) 0.4
(v) 0
(g) 0
(c) 0
(b) 0
(x) 0


So to solve for Vs:

Vs = 0*Ve + 0.7*Vh + 0.4Vs + 0*Vv + 0*Vg + 0*Vc + 0*Vb + 0*Vx

Notice that we have a Vs on both sides of the equal sign. This corresponds to the loop on the Search node.

We can drop out the variables that are multiplied by zero.

Vs = 0.7*Vh + 0.4Vs

Repeat the steps for all the columns of the transition matrix and you end up with the equations to solve for. But, most packages want the equations setup in matrix form. So, let's get all the variables on the left side of the equal sign.

Vs - 0.4Vs - 0.7*Vh

Simplifies into:

0.6Vs - 0.7*Vh

If we do this with all the equations we can finally put it into matrix form. But we can't solve it yet. We need another vector to solve with. This vector will contain the input into the system. In this case the entry into the system is into the Entry page so the vertical vector is:

(e) 1
(h) 0
(s) 0
(v) 0
(g) 0
(c) 0
(b) 0
(x) 0

If we call our first matrix that we created from the transition matrix A and our input vertical vector B, we have the classic A*B = 0 that we can solve for.

Now we get into the R solution for the above. As I was working out the algorithm to setup the problem for calling the R solve() routine it hit me how simple the solution was!

Let's call our transition matrix supplied by the authors as M.

We can take transpose of M and let's call it A.

Take A and multiply by the scalar value of -1. This is the act of moving all the variables to the left side of the equals sign.

Now we combine variables we are solving for in each row of A by adding 1 to the trace of matrix A.

And there we have our final form of A. We can now solve for A*B = 0!

Here is my solution in R




# Define the column information for easy access by name

e <- 1;
h <- 2;
s <- 3;
v <- 4;
g <- 5;
c <- 6;
b <- 7;
x <- 8;

# M will be the supplied transition matrix

M <- matrix(c(0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.7,0,0.1,0,0,0.2,0,0,0.4,0.2,0.15,0,0,0.25,0,0,0,0,0.65,0,0,0.35,0,0,0,0,0,0.3,0.6,0.1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0), ncol=8, nrow=8, byrow=TRUE);

# B is the vector that describes entry into the system
B <- matrix(c(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0),nrow=8,ncol=1);

VisitsByTransitionMatrix <- function(M, B) {
A <- t(M);
A <- -1 * A;
for (i in 1:sqrt(length(A))) {
j <- i;
A[i,j] <- A[i,j] + 1;
};
return(solve(A,B));
};

Visits <- VisitsByTransitionMatrix(M, B);

> Visits
[,1]
[1,] 1.0000000
[2,] 1.0000000
[3,] 1.1666667
[4,] 0.2333333
[5,] 0.4266667
[6,] 0.1280000
[7,] 0.2560000
[8,] 1.0000000

> Visits[e]
[1] 1
> Visits[h]
[1] 1
> Visits[s]
[1] 1.166667
> Visits[v]
[1] 0.2333333
> Visits[g]
[1] 0.4266667
> Visits[c]
[1] 0.128
> Visits[b]
[1] 0.256
> Visits[x]
[1] 1


And there we go! Using this I could have taken that monster 538x538 matrix and easily figured out the number of hits for each page based upon the derived transition matrix and used the R routine for playing a lot of what-if scenarios. For example, what if we want to change some of the probabilities between nodes, how will that effect the visit to other pages? Now it is simple to crunch the numbers. Huzzah!

My next task is to apply PDQ-R to solving the rest of the case study. Later in the chapter there are service times associated with each page and that will determine the total service demand per page and ultimately the page response time for each page and the effect on internal components that will be modeled in my PDQ-R model.

I can really see where I could have used this modeling at my previous job at a major e-commerce site. It would have come in really stinkin' handy to be sure.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Automating the finding of coefficients for the USL

I got to playing around with R more and I've always found that to learn a language I need to solve problems with the language. I'm sure most everybody else does the same thing. My goal was to write a R function that imported a CSV with performance information to gonkulate against.

In my case, I'm using the basic performance information from "Guerrilla Capacity Planning." I've created a CSV file with the number of procs and the resultant ray trace benchmark from Table 5.1:




   1:  C:\Users\auswipe\Desktop>cat raw_throughput.csv

   2:  p,x

   3:  1,20

   4:  4,78

   5:  8,130

   6:  12,170

   7:  16,190

   8:  20,200

   9:  24,210

  10:  28,230

  11:  32,260

  12:  48,280

  13:  64,310



Then I wrote an R function to crunch the numbers:




   1:  uslCoefficients <- function(dataFile) {

   2:    uslData <- read.csv(dataFile, header=TRUE);

   3:    uslData$c <- uslData$x / uslData$x[1];

   4:    usl <- nls(c ~ p/(1+sigma*(p-1)+kappa*p*(p-1)),

   5:               uslData,

   6:               algorithm="port",

   7:               start=c(sigma=0.0, kappa=0.0),

   8:               lower=c(0,0));

   9:    sigma <- coef(usl)["sigma"];

  10:    kappa <- coef(usl)["kappa"];

  11:    return(list(sigma=sigma, kappa=kappa));

  12:  };



The function uslCoefficient returns a list where I can reference the "sigma" and "kappa" by named index:




   1:  > uslCoef <- uslCoefficients("c:\\Users\\auswipe\\Desktop\\raw_throughput.csv")

   2:  > uslCoef["sigma"]

   3:  $sigma

   4:      sigma 

   5:  0.0497973 

   6:   

   7:  > uslCoef["kappa"]

   8:  $kappa

   9:         kappa 

  10:  1.143404e-05 

  11:   

  12:  > uslCoef

  13:  $sigma

  14:      sigma 

  15:  0.0497973 

  16:   

  17:  $kappa

  18:         kappa 

  19:  1.143404e-05 



R is pretty nifty. I doubt I'll ever make use of all the power that is available but it'll be better than writing my own stat routines.

Using R to calculate coefficients of the Universal Scaling Law with Non-Linear Regression

Ooh! Doesn't that sound fancy?

Several weeks ago I purchased the eBook from O'Reilly called "The Art of Capacity Planning." I've always thought that load testing and capacity planning went hand-in-hand. One is not a replacement for the other but one can assist with the other. Load test helps out capacity planning by applying load to psuedo-production systems and capacity planning helps load testing by verifying results in load test against real world systems.

I finished "The Art of Capacity Planning" and wanted to read more on the subject and picked up a copy of "Guerrilla Capacity Planning" which has a lot more math than "The Art of Capacity Planning." One of the concepts is the Universal Scaling Law based on Amdhal's Law. Dr. Neil J Gunther is a smart cookie. He even has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics which makes him closer to Gordon Freeman than I'll ever be! (Side question: Do Ph.D's in Theoretical Physics get crowbars at graduation?)

Anyhoo, in section 5.6.1 one of the methods in the book is to use Excel to do second degree polynomial regression for the calculation of two necessary coefficients, sigma and kappa. But when I tried to use Excel I was getting a negative value for sigma and one of the rules of the Universal Scaling Law is that the coefficients can never, ever, ever be negative. I just figured that I fat fingered something and tried it again and once again, got mismatching results.

I scratched my noggin, tried to figure out where I err'd and did some Googling and came across this entry of Dr. Gunther's blog:

Negative Scalability Coefficients in Excel

Because in Excel (and some other packages, like my TI-89) you can't put a constraint on the lower limits of the coefficient, you might from time to time get negative coefficients. But from reading the blog entry I see that other people are using R with success.

This is the first time that I've ever messed around with R for statistical purposes. In the past I've written some stat routines (years ago!) in C# for comparing before/after load testing results.

Here is how I used R from start to finish to gonkulate the coefficients.

Using the data from Section 5.3 I did the following in R:

First I defined my p array, which in the book is the number of processors used for ray tracing:




   1:  p <- c(1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 48, 64)



Then I defined my c array, which is the relative capacity for the number of processors used for ray tracing:




   1:  c <- c(1.0, 3.9, 6.5, 8.5, 9.5, 10.0, 10.5, 11.5, 13.0, 14.0, 15.5)



I combined both arrays into a data frame for later use.




   1:  df <- data.frame(p, c)



And when I check out the contents of df I get:




   1:  df

   2:      p    c

   3:  1   1  1.0

   4:  2   4  3.9

   5:  3   8  6.5

   6:  4  12  8.5

   7:  5  16  9.5

   8:  6  20 10.0

   9:  7  24 10.5

  10:  8  28 11.5

  11:  9  32 13.0

  12:  10 48 14.0

  13:  11 64 15.5



I can now use a non-linear regression routine with my data frame that I entered above.




   1:  usl <- nls(c ~ p/(1+sigma*(p-1)+kappa*p*(p-1)), df, algorithm="port", start=c(sigma=0.0, kappa=0.0), lower=c(0,0))



I can then access the coefficients by named index:




   1:  sigma <- coef(usl)["sigma"]

   2:  kappa <- coef(usl)["kappa"]

   3:   

   4:  sigma

   5:      sigma 

   6:  0.0497973 

   7:   

   8:  kappa

   9:         kappa 

  10:  1.143404e-05 

  11:   



Huzzah!

I can now interpolate the relative capacity based upon the USL and the coefficients that were previously gonkulated and add that to my current data frame, df, that I defined earlier. I do have to note that I was a slackard and did not apply the significant digits rules as outlined in Chapter 3 of "Guerrilla Capacity Planning."




   1:  df$proj_c <- p/(1 + sigma * (p - 1) + kappa * p * (p - 1))



There are the projected relative capacities. Yay!




   1:  df

   2:      p    c    proj_c

   3:  1   1  1.0  1.000000

   4:  2   4  3.9  3.479686

   5:  3   8  6.5  5.929346

   6:  4  12  8.5  7.745536

   7:  5  16  9.5  9.144406

   8:  6  20 10.0 10.253815

   9:  7  24 10.5 11.154233

  10:  8  28 11.5 11.898837

  11:  9  32 13.0 12.524174

  12:  10 48 14.0 14.259114

  13:  11 64 15.5 15.298811



And here I will make a simple little graph of the actual versus projected relative capacity:




   1:  plot(p, c)

   2:  lines(p, proj_c)



And here is the graph that is generated:



Kinda nifty, eh?

I can see myself using R more in the future. I'd rather write routines for automagic analysis of data with R than write my own routines from the ground up.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

Push-To-Test

I went to a four hour presentation on Push-To-Test yesterday. It seems pretty nifty, the idea of wrapping an automated testing framework around a bunch of open source projects such as Selenium, soapUI and other goodies.

The presentation was a little hectic but it got the general idea across. I would have preferred to get to the meat of the subject quicker but the presenter did have 20 people to deal with and we had to go with the common denominator. No biggie.

The only thing that I wasn't too big was the idea of converting the Selenium tests for web tests from XUL into Java or Jython for more programmable control. After the conversion there is no going back to the original SeleniumIDE tool from what I saw. But, I guess that isn't much different from what I've done with LoadRunner and VSTS a bajillion times before when I had a bunch of custom code from the tree view into code. They did have an IDE so it's not too bad in hind site. I didn't get a chance to play around with the IDE to see how it compares to Eclipse or Visual Studio.

But, it is free for download to use the unsupported version, so I say thumbs up.

The idea of using Selenium for the web tests is pretty nifty as you get good control with AJAX controls that are a bit of a pain to control in HTTP Virtual user. I hadn't thought of doing that in the past.

I was told that transactions and nested transactions were supported but didn't get a chance to see them in action.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Learning QTP

It's been a long time between blog posts. Since this blog is mainly for myself, that isn't a problem. :-)

I'm starting to learn QTP and finding that it looks like a real handy tool for functional and integration testing. I'm still trying to get myself to not look at it as an alternate load testing tool and trying to use the interface and not look at each problem as more code to be written. I had the same problem initially with JMeter as well having come from a background where I would normally add a bunch of custom code after the initial script creation.

I'm not a big fan of VBScript but for the purpose at hand I have to say it is probably a better choice than using C like LoadRunner. Easier to create a COM object to be invoked with CreateObject for slicing and dicing of data.

I'm not sure if raw HTML can be pulled in with QTP, yet. I wouldn't be surprised if it can. QTP seems to be a pretty nifty tool. No doubt it will help with future job searches.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Got a job!

I accepted an informal job offer today at the same pay as my previous job (which wasn't too shabby). I will be a performance engineer on a rather large project involving Red Hat RHEL 4.5, Orace and Java/WebLogic. Here is a really good opportunity to bone up on Java performance analysis along with WebLogic and Java. I'm not much of a Java dude so I will finally be getting up to speed.

I'm not to worried about the RHEL as I've been using various flavors of Unices (primarily FreeBSD) over the years. I won't get into the whole debate of genetic UNIX versus copied UNIX. Just not worth wasting my breath.

Another opportunity to learn Oracle performance tuning as well. I've done a lot with SQL Server over the years and I hope that some of it applies to the Oracle side of the house.

It looks like I'll be back to using Load Runner again. Looks like either Winsock/SOA or HTTP vusers. I've heard some bad things about the SOA Vusers with respect to generated script complexity and ease of correlation of data. All I know at this point is that the client is a swing UI running a Java application that will connect to the middle tier. Hopefully it is all done via SOA/WebServies. I have an interesting idea of utilizing WireShark and chaosreader.pl and some custom perl scripts for generationg clean vusers for the probject. We'll just have to wait and see how it goes.

Another interesting thing will be working out of the house full time. I have two previous coworkers that do this and they love it but I am a very social creature. We'll see how it goes. I will get a laptop and an aircard from my new employer so that means I will be able to work from any location so I should be able to get out of the house often and see friends for lunch, which has always been important to me.

So, my adventure continues, just not on the original vector. :-)

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Taking some time to keep on learning.

Since I am unemployed and not having anything better to do with my time I decided I would check out "Apache JMeter" by Emily H. Halili (Packt, 2008).

It's a light read and I found that Chapter 7 (Advanced Features) was the most helpful to myself as I am not a n00b to JMeter. However, I felt that Chapter 7 would have been better served if BeanShell processing would have been tackled. I've found from my load testing experience in the past that at some point the return HTML is gonna have to be sliced and diced and data extracted that cannot be done with a simple RegEx extraction (like what is covered in Chapter 7 of the book).

Other than that, I think that if you are a total n00b to JMeter it isn't half bad as a simple introduction to using JMeter for performance/load testing. There's a lot more to performance/load testing than the book covers such as metrics collection, number crunching, et cetera but the book doesn't purport itself to be the end all be all of explaining performance/load testing so I can't complain.

Three stars.